Nick Best is a down on his luck veteran of the military who has chosen to live on the streets due to his drinking habits and his emotional issues. But he is given a so-called second chance when the corrupt mayor of the city he hangs around tells the chief of police to offer a substantial amount of money to Nick for him to keep, Clancy, a runaway abused girl for a week so that the mayor, who is losing his reelection campaign, can have a media field day. Skeptical of this elaborate scheme, Nick decides to take the girl under his wing to protect her, but he soon finds that she is changing his outlook on life.
Production Quality (.5 point)
Why do Kelly’s Filmworks productions always look so drab? It’s like they were all filmed in cloudy weather. Though the video quality of Clancy is fine, the camera work is atrocious, including very tight shots and shaky camera work that looks like it was literally filmed in an alley with a camcorder. Thus, the lighting is very inconsistent and there are constant loud outside sounds. There is no soundtrack to speak of—just background silence. Sets and locations are very cheap—no thought was given to making them look interesting. Finally, there is absolutely no editing as all content is included—and we mean all content. Every Jefferson Moore silent staring scene is here. In short, the continual creation of Kelly’s Filmworks productions is baffling to us. They obviously aren’t spending much money on these, but what is the real point if it’s going to look this bad?
Plot and Storyline Quality (0 points)
Clancy includes perhaps the most trumped up scheme possible. Who really believes that a corrupt mayor (aka the most cheesy villain available besides Goliath from Timothy Chey’s David and Goliath) would pay off a random homeless guy to keep an abused girl ‘safe’ for a week in order to boost reelection chances? In what universe would that work? Most importantly, why do we need a movie about this? Why do we need to be forced to see long sequences of characters (mostly Jefferson Moore) wandering around and staring into the distance? There is no way this is going to hold anyone’s attention, especially when the dialogue is extremely void and lackadaisical. The story is based on far too many coincidences to keep it going and there is so little content here that we can hardly believe the runtime lasted as long as it did. All we can say is that we were glad when it was over.
Acting Quality (0 points)
Recycling the same old cast members from Kelly’s Filmworks (they weren’t that good in the first place), Clancy is much like the others from this company. Makeup is bad, costuming is laughable. The only emotions present are either deadpan or over the top. The line delivery is beyond lazy. One would think these cast members would get better with experience.
Jefferson Moore and company are experts at thinking up the most mundane movie ideas and then following through with them. How have they made so many feature length films? One thing you can say for them is that they save money—in all the wrong ways. These movies are definitely easy and cheap to make, but why do we need them? They are utterly pointless and contribute nothing. Maybe they won’t make as many in the future. But wait…there’s a sequel to this film????
Final Rating: .5 out of 10 points