Damon Sharp, a new college graduate, must leave his glory days of playing college basketball behind and return to his hometown to live with his mother and brother while he waits to be drafted into the NBA. However, he returns to find the same old things being done at home. His brother quickly pulls Damon back into the partying lifestyle as he awaits a big sports contract. However, Damon is constantly nagged by his newfound faith, wondering how he is supposed to live it out as his brother tries to lead him astray. Will he find the path that God wants him to take before it’s too late?
Production Quality (1 point)
Midrange is another typical freshman production that looks good but has a collection of errors that drag it down. Video quality is fine, but camera work is inconsistent. Audio quality is also poor, but some effort was put into the soundtrack. Sets, locations, and props are commendable but they are slightly limited and cheap. Furthermore, there is really no editing to speak of in this film as it progresses unimaginatively from one thing to the next. In the end, this is forgivable as a first-time production and hopefully this team will grow more in the future.
Plot and Storyline Quality (.5 point)
Though this story is based on loosely interesting idea about the struggles of Christians and their families of origin, it is packaged in a very flat and linear presentation that has no real twists or creative elements. Everything is given at face value, including the stiff dialogue and the descriptions of vague off-screen content that might have been helpful to include. Though they mean well in presenting the struggles of a new Christian, the Christian message is too cheap and plastic to be accessed by the audience. In the same vein, the characters are not deep enough or realistic enough to be related to, even though their struggles are real. Thus, this story just boils down to a formulaic and predictable storyline that reaches an inevitable conclusion in which everything is fixed. It would be one thing if the viewers could be taken along for an accessible experience, but this did not happen.
Acting Quality (.5 point)
Another mark of an amateur film is an amateur cast. While this is not inherently a problem, these cast members sometimes seem unsure of themselves. They are often too robotic and measured and seem like they performed everything in one take. This is more evident due to some obvious line mistakes. Though there is some good here, they need a lot of more coaching than this.
Meager beginnings should never be frowned upon, but there are certainly ways budding film makers can learn from their past mistakes. Without good funding, story writing skills need to showcased to prove that the film maker has something to offer the field. Amateur casts can be difficult to deal with, but it is possible to make something out of it. Overall, what we always look for is improvement, so we will see what happens next.
Final Rating: 2 out of 10 points