Everyone’s lives are intertwined in some way, and everyone lives according to the timing God has given us. We have no idea what God’s plan is, but our job is to trust Him no matter what. This film follows the interconnected lives of a desperate doctor and his cancer-ridden wife, a belligerent homeless man with a past he wants to forget, a struggling military vet trying to move on with his life, and a pregnant girl who feels like she has no one to turn to. As their lives converge together, they discover that God’s timing really is perfect.
Production Quality (1.5 points)
As a first-time production effort, this film isn’t half bad. Video quality is good, even though the camera work is randomly shaky at times. Sometimes audio quality isn’t what it should be, but it’s mostly fine. The soundtrack is very creative and intriguing. Sets, locations, and props are all well-constructed and appropriate. Yet the editing is not very well thought out as a lot of the subplots seemed to be tossed together like a salad, as we will discuss further in a moment. But overall, it’s clear that effort was put into this film, and with some small improvements, this team will go a long way.
Plot and Storyline Quality (1 point)
Storylines that depict intertwining yet seemingly unrelated subplots are hard to execute properly. Much like Do You Believe?, In God’s Time is sometimes too much of a tangled web that comes off as disjointed rather than smooth. However, it is interesting and realistic to show how people’s lives are connected to one another, yet this story needs more organization to be effective. Nonetheless, realistic issues are explored throughout this plot in the context of believable and accessible characters. Dialogue is good, but it could be a little deeper. There are also a lot of confusing psychological elements throughout the movie that seem interesting but need more explanation and exploration in order to be understood fully. Due to these confusions, it’s sometimes hard to know what’s going on, even though there is a meaningful message presented here. The ‘magical’ plot device utilized throughout this story is a bit cheesy and tends to fix problems too easily, but at least audiences can make realistic connections to the people presented here. In the end, this plot shows a lot of creative potential that needs organization and clarity to make it great.
Acting Quality (2 points)
Though this cast is semi-amateurish, they post some professional performances. They are mostly believable in assuming the roles of their characters, yet there are some overdone emotions throughout. Some performances tend to be underwhelming, but on the whole, this is an above-average section.
In a field crowded out by tons of small groups making movies designed to dip into the inspirational market, writing a good plot that contains realistic characters is the key to success in standing out. This creative team has a lot of the tools and talents they need for success—now they just need some refinement and organization skills. They would do well to consult some seasoned film makers in how they can go about this, because they are on the precipice of greatness.
Final Rating: 4.5 out of 10 points