Since Thomas grew up without a positive father influence in his life, he was influenced by the television and by the wrong crowd of friends. As he embraces violent behavior, his mother is at a loss of what to do with him except to pray for him. One day, his violence finally catches up with him and gets him in trouble with an elderly man. But rather than press charges, the elderly man takes Thomas under his wing and decides to positively influence him. Slowly but surely, Thomas’ life turns around.
Production Quality (1 point)
This production begins very roughly, with very cheap video quality and some poor lighting. Camera work is relatively stable throughout, but audio quality is very poor, including loud background noises and an overbearing soundtrack. Sets, locations, and props are relatively limited. However, most production elements improve as the movie goes on. Yet the editing is consistently a problem as it allows too many montages and lagging scenes. Overall, this is a very raw production that needed better funding.
Plot and Storyline Quality (0 points)
Though on its face this is an interesting plot idea, it does not translate to reality. Heavy-handed narration stunts character development, as does the cheap dialogue. The message presented here is very juvenile as it treats all entertainment as evil (what about this film?) and offers an extremely simplistic and childish view of why people act the way they do. Large time jumps cause a lot of off-screen content to be referred to, which makes the storyline vague and hard to pin down. As previously mentioned, there are too many flat and meandering scenes that simply boil down to a conclusion that unrealistically fixes all the problems with no real consequences. The story leaves too many vague concepts unexplored and will likely cause viewers to roll their eyes at the simplicity and silliness of how these otherwise important issues are handled.
Acting Quality (1.5 points)
Though this small cast has some potential, they are too often unsure of themselves. Line delivery is inconsistent, as are emotions. There are some good moments here, but the bad moments hold the cast back from being all they could be, thus warranting an average score.
Movies like Slow Fade feel like beta tests that were not necessarily intended for full release to the public. The good thing is that most people will likely not see this film, but that’s so unfortunate to wish such a thing on a movie. This creative team may mean well, but they are lacking in proper presentation. They need to try to connect their plots with reality rather than vaguely and childishly explore important concepts. Then they will possibly find themselves with some better funding and more success as film makers.
Final Rating: 2.5 out of 10 points