The end of the world is nearing, and all of the bees are dying. Thus, Dr. BEEatrix Cera has been enlisted by the mysterious Chairman of New World Genetics to create the Immortal Bee, an experiment that will causes bees to live forever and produce food that makes humans live forever. Simple right? Well, with the food stores running out, even though cancer has been cured by a random Catholic guy who gives food away, the Chairman demands immortality from BEEatrix. However, at what cost will BEEatrix go to save the world and try to get rid of the dreams of Jesus she keeps having? What will happen when the end finally comes?
Production Quality (2 points)
While it’s clear that time and effort was spent on this independent production, which is evidenced in the good video quality and camera work throughout, this film still seems quite indie. While the sets, locations, and props are fairly well done and while the soundtrack is intriguing, there is quite a bit of obvious CGI and cheesy animated overlaying throughout this film. However, audio quality is fine, and the only other issue to point out here is that the editing is quite choppy. Nevertheless, there is enough effort and funding here to make this an overall above-average production that is reminiscent of the modern productions we see in Christian film today.
Plot and Storyline Quality (0 points)
What the world doesn’t need is another half-baked Christian apocalyptic film, but at least The Second Coming of Christ gets past that overused speculative beginning of the tribulation known as the Rapture. We rarely get a look at the end of the apocalypse in the Christian cinematic universe, but we get that opportunity in this film. However, it doesn’t deliver at all. The plot is very incoherent as it is based on flimsy dialogue and very thin and empty characters. A lot of the end times elements are presented in a very juvenile fashion, and key concepts of this storyline are not well-explained at all as the entire world hangs in the balance waiting for immortal bees to be born. Umm, what? Besides this, the villain is very cheesy, and there is a lot of Catholic message-pushing. There is very little to hold the interest, and this seems more like a regular sci-fi plot rather than and end-of-the-world depiction. It’s really quite boring, actually.
Acting Quality (.5 point)
The acting of this film is particularly bad as all of the emotions are painfully forced, as if through a sieve, and the cast members are extremely dramatic with their line delivery. Some cast members, however, are just lackadaisical or clueless. There is a tiny amount of good here (how did Quinton Aaron get stuck in this movie?), but on the whole, this section wraps up a very poor film effort.
It seems like this movie started off with half of an idea and just tried to run with it without realizing that it was running on fumes and had nothing substantial to show for it at all. How are films like this even made? Think of all the projects that get abandoned, but stuff like this one gets put through. Well, at least we can say there’s never been a Christian film about the bee apocalypse before this one. There are new ideas being born daily, apparently.
You never know when the Rapture might happen…it might just happen on a Sunday morning when a long-winded pastor is preaching about how Christians can escape all the current and coming evil. This story follows a whole bunch of random people that go to this particular church as some of them live for the Lord while others pretend to. When that moment comes…some of them will be…left behind (oops wrong movie).
Production Quality (1.5 points)
Surprisingly, this awful film has a somewhat decent production, certainly a better one than its cousin Final: The Rapture. The production of Sunday Morning Rapture is mostly average, with fine video quality and camera work. However, the soundtrack is quite overpowering at times, as are weird sound effects. There are also some bizarre special effects, even though the sets, locations, and props are mostly okay. Furthermore, the editing is very disorienting and off-putting, but one can’t expect much from another strange apocalyptic concept. Yet all of this aside, the remainder of the film’s elements are just awful.
Plot and Storyline Quality (-1 points)
Besides this ‘plot’ being a random collection of schizophrenically presented scenes that have little to no relation to one another, the film is chock-full of very heavy-handed juvenile message-pushing about obvious Rapture beliefs and apocalyptic concepts. Dialogue is very in-your-face as it feels like the characters are just reading lines from a John Hagee book. If this wasn’t bad enough, this movie progressively more insane as it goes on, jumping from Latin American and South Korean media coverage of sudden Rapture-induced natural disasters to people who were left behind literally screeching and rolling around on the floor of the church (without Benny Hinn even present). Basically, it’s an experience you have to see to believe. What we can’t believe is how these sorts of drug-laced Christian films are continually generated.
Acting Quality (-1 points)
As you can expect, the acting that accompanies to sheer madness is extreme and over the top in every way. Line delivery is very forced and eventually just becomes screeching, yelling, and wailing. Thus, the performances are extremely theatrical and overly dramatic, and cap off an overall embarrassing experience.
This is 2017, and Christian moves like this are still FUNDED and created. What was the pitch for this film? ‘Our church needs to make a movie about a Rapture that takes place on a Sunday.’ It sounds okay on its face…if we need another apocalyptic film, that is. But then to couple this with downright insanity is highly unacceptable. You have to try to make a film this bad, hence the negative rating.
What if the story of the Apostle Paul took place in the near future, when the government cracks down on religious freedom and forces the true Christians underground? Paul seeks out Christians to bring into custody to further his status among the government, but a profound experience causes him to turn around and change his ways by joined the very people he once tried to stamp out. Now he is on the run from his former employers and the Christians are wary about trusting him. Will the Way be able to prevail in the face of grave opposition?
Production Quality (2 points)
It is clear that many attempts were made in this film to craft a very professional action-based production, which is something we rarely see in Christian film these days. Video quality is what it should be and camera work is great, especially in the action scenes. Audio quality is mostly good and the soundtrack is intriguing. However, sometimes there are some oddly lit scenes, as if the producers are trying to be too artistic, and the indoor sets sometimes suffer from lack of creativity. Yet the outdoor locations are very well-constructed. The editing sometimes leaves something to be desired, as some scenes lag too long while others are cut short. But in the end, this is a commendable effort and one that will hopefully yield even better fruit in the future.
Plot and Storyline Quality (1 point)
It’s definitely not easy to take on such a large Bible-story-set-in-the-future concept, especially with all of the characters that are involved. Sometimes it’s too awkward for the writers to try to force parallels; it might have been better to keep the associations looser. However, there is still lots of good plot content—perhaps too much content for a film less than two hours long. This is a highly complex story that sometimes gets lost in itself and may have been better suited for a miniseries, since there are a lot of ideas crammed into such a short time frame. This is a good problem to have, yet it leaves too many disjointed subplots in its wake. The characters are pretty good, even if they are limited in scope. The biggest red flag to raise here is the very confusing and isolating ending that is hard to explain or understand. In the end, this story desperately needed to be a series in order to be truly effective.
Acting Quality (3 points)
The casting and acting is clearly the strongest point of this film, as there are no errors to speak of. This is a very large cast, yet they are all very talented and cast very appropriately. Emotions are believable and line delivery is on target. The cast members make this film as good as it is.
We realize it’s hard to make an independent series or miniseries, but with the PureFlix on Demand platform, things have been made easier. More budding film makers need to take advantage of this resource to boost their brand so that we can see some actually worthwhile Christian series come to light. Regardless, with some production tweaks, more funding, and continued casting success, this creative team is going to go big places.
Anwaar Osem and David Sutherland are on the run from the powerful force that has taken over the American government and has sent its enforcers to capture and kill those who resist their anti-Christian rule. As they hide in the woods, they decide to record the truth about Christianity for all the world to see, even though the enforcement tries to stamp it out. Will they be able to spread the truth and save people’s lives before it’s too late?
Production Quality (.5 point)
Despite a somewhat strong beginning and several years of production experience, this Crystal Creek series is not what it should be. Camera work is very shaky throughout, like a camcorder is being used. Video quality is fine, but there are way too many scenes filmed in the dark. Audio quality is also below standard as sound effects that sound like they came from Final: The Rapture are included. The soundtrack is also underwhelming. Sets, locations, and props are severely limited and cheap-looking. Finally, editing in this series is very poor a lot of unnecessary scenes and sequences are included, seemingly just to make the ‘episodes’ longer. In short, a 2017 production should be much higher quality than this.
Plot and Storyline Quality (0 points)
Though there are plenty of potentially interesting and creative ideas at the heart of this series, they are never properly developed. This season overall lacks focus as it relies on a very vague and unexplained dystopian premise and stock suspense dialogue. There are far too many unrelated and empty characters that are put through unrealistic circumstances. The subplots are overall disjointed and any ‘twists’ that are employed are actually quite cheesy. Finally, the end of this season is very confusing and really doesn’t inspire one to want a second season. It’s very difficult to see the justification for this so-called series.
Acting Quality (1 point)
Can someone explain to us why Daniel Knudsen consistency uses an obviously fake British accent? It’s very off-putting and annoying. Elsewhere, this is a typical Crystal Creek cast with a few new additions that have some talent. However, acting coaching is still lacking as a lot of the line delivery in this series is monotone and phoned in. Emotions are difficult to grasp. It’s possible that this cast could do better with coaching, however.
Continuity Quality (0 points)
Each so-called ‘episode’ is basically just the same plot over and over again. Thus, there are no character arcs or real plot twists, as previously mentioned. The format this ‘series’ is placed in makes it more like a movie than a season, since the breaks between the episodes are totally arbitrary and unnecessary. They all run together, thus creating zero continuity.
We are certain that the Crystal Creek Media team means well, so we hope they will accept constructive criticism and use it improve in the future. They have the drive to make movies and series, which is good, and they have the means to consistently produce them, though not very well. They definitely like to build strong messages in their stories, but they need to build strong stories to hold their message properly. They need to pool their resources to make one good production rather than a collection of bad ones. Finally, their acting pool is limited, but they can be worked with if better coaching is employed. We know all of this is easier said than done, but it’s so worth it in the end.
Carl Onoway is a captain in the new world army and is constantly tasked with making sure the new laws are enforced. Children are not allowed to be raised by their parents and can only be raised by qualified professionals. Everyone is required to take weekly medication to make them forget about their pasts and what has happened. Propaganda, such as religious materials, is not allowed. But what happens when these rules begin to be disobeyed? What happens when Carl and his wife begin to remember the past?
Production Quality (0 points)
Here’s a good rule of thumb for production: if you don’t have the budget to make it good, don’t make it at all. This is especially true for sci-fi\speculative dystopian productions. These types of projects require a lot of funding to create proper special effects, props, sets, and locations. Unfortunately, Remember does not have what it takes in this department. Audio quality is especially horrific, with lots of echoes and background noises. Lighting is very inconsistent, with a lot of the outside scenes inordinately bright. Camera work is very shaky and video quality is inconsistent. Sets, locations, and props are very cheap-looking, with obvious low-quality special effects and animation riding on top of them. The editing is lazy as it includes constant useless time subtitles and repeated sequences. In the end, this is one of those nightmare productions that should have never been released to the public.
Plot and Storyline Quality (0 points)
Much like the propaganda pushed in the plot of this film, the writers obviously had their own agenda in making this movie. Otherwise, there’s no reason for its creation. The dystopian premise constructed here is extremely absurd and juvenile as the viewer is constantly reminded that kids cannot be raised by their parents in this world but is given no realistic explanation as to why. This is combined with constant obvious references to how the natural family structure is attacked in this dystopian world. Rather than create meaningful characters, time is filled with message-pushing and repeating the same activities over and over again. The villains are laughable and the protagonists are plastic. As the story meanders and repeats itself, it still follows a predictable progression with a typical suspense climax scene. Basically, what appears to be a convoluted idea just boils down to a typical plot structure with no real surprises.
Acting Quality (0 points)
Another grave error of a poorly-funded dystopian thriller is terrible costuming, and Remember sports this quality. In an attempt to be futuristic, the costuming is very cheap and rushed. As for the acting, line delivery is very half-hearted while emotional delivery is very forced and sometimes over the top. Once again, this is another swing and a miss.
We desperately need new genre-breaking films in the Christian market, but this is just not the way. What could be better than a well-funded, well-constructed dystopian thriller with a Christian worldview that’s not too pushy? Unfortunately, Remember’s attempt to do this totally failed. Maybe the creative team should have saved their money a bit more or made a dystopian short film just to get the ball rolling. We know that funding an independent Christian film is very difficult, especially starting out, but that doesn’t mean you need to bite off more than you can chew. There is no shame in doing the best you can with what you have. Unfortunately, Remember is not the best.