Tom is grief-stricken when his father suddenly and mysteriously dies, but he soon discovers a strange artifact his father left behind that opens up a whole new world for him that he never knew existed. Using the device, Tom travels back in time to find that all he ever knew is not as it seems and he is caught in a battle that spans decades. Only he can stop the evil that is coming, if he has enough faith and courage.
Production Quality (1.5 points)
It seems like the entire point of A Path in Time was to show off the professional special effects and animation the production team obviously had access to. There are also other good production elements to be found, such as fine video quality and camera work. Audio quality is also on standard, though the soundtrack leaves something to be desired. Unfortunately, sets and locations are fairly cheap and limited. Finally, there is next to no editing as scenes are dragged out and expounded upon just to make the runtime reach barely sixty minutes. In the end, it is clear that some thought was put into this production, but this movie is still only half of an idea.
Plot and Storyline Quality (0 points)
While we always welcome different genres of Christian film, time travel plots are always going to be problematic, illogical, and unnecessarily mind-bending. Sci-fi plots are already hard enough to craft without introducing all sorts of isolating concepts through constant information dump dialogue. As the characters drone on about ideas foreign to the audience and speculative lingo, there is little chance to get to know them as people. There are too many convenient turns and highly confusing plot ‘twists’ that are associated with the time travel concept. This is not even to mention the fact that the concepts and premise presented in this barely-one-hour film are far too expansive and complicated to cram into this time frame. We need more gradual development of these ideas rather than an uninvited dump of ideas. Also, was this film meant to be continued? It’s been twelve years and there is no plan for a sequel, even though the story clearly leaves the viewer hanging. Overall, this story is far too confusing to warrant any points.
Acting Quality (1 point)
All too often, this cast exhibits very lifeless emotions and monotone line delivery. While the performances are certainly not all bad, they could also use a lot of work. Some effort was put towards historical costuming at least. It seems like this cast has potential, but it goes untapped.
It’s very hard to determine exactly what the purpose of A Path in Time was. The creators had a vague idea and some special effect software, so they charged right ahead to make a beta test. Perhaps they were just experimenting, but was this really worth releasing to the public? It seems like they could have built off of the ideas here over time and not rushed through them. There are certainly many struggles to independent film making, but time and consistency are almost always on your side. If God wants to make a film, the provision will always be there. We just need to make sure we aren’t rushing things.
Final Rating: 2.5 out of 10 points