Stephen Kendrick (not the film maker) is a computer science expert who finds himself a part of a major project on artificial intelligence at MIT. However, when the government shuts the project down due to safety concerns, Stephen and a friend of his decide to go underground with the project and ask the new AI software some pressing questions. They want to know if the AI can prove the existence of God, as well as other important philosophical concerns. Will they be able to discover the answers they are looking for before time runs out?
Production Quality (1.5 points)
Though it’s a clear effort was put into this production to make it professional, there are still some nagging issues with The God Question that keep it from being all that it could be. Video quality, camera work, and audio quality are all fine. However, sometimes it seems like there needs to be more of a soundtrack. There are too many cheap special effects pertaining to the technological props, which also need somewhat of an upgrade. Sets and locations are okay, yet they are partially limited. Finally, the editing of this film is quite poor as sequences lag too long and there is little driving purpose. In the end, this is a good effort, but there are definitely places for improvement.
Plot and Storyline Quality (.5 point)
Though this is an interesting and unique topic to make a movie on, it’s too focused on only the artificial intelligence concept. There is little plot content or character development outside of this one idea that dominates the film. Though there are attempts at complexity, there isn’t any real complexity or plot development that would otherwise make this film interesting. The story is all about the same thing and is fixated on the artificial intelligence concept, although there is some brief exploration of the philosophical debate surrounding this idea. Yet it’s still not enough and we don’t get enough of a change to get to know the people who are involved in this story. After killing and wasting a lot of time, the plot finally paints itself into a corner and ends abruptly without figuring out what it really wants to do. In the end, this is an unfinished idea that feels like it was forced to happen.
Acting Quality (1.5 points)
Though this cast is semi-professional, they often come off as overly practiced in their line delivery and extremely matter-of-fact. Emotions are not always believable, yet most of these performances are average. But the bottom line is that there were a lot of elements in this film that feel like they’re not reaching their full potential.
We definitely different sorts of plots and ideas like this in Christian film, but the biggest temptation for sci-fi stories in general is to make the movie all about the centralized concept. In doing this, dialogue and character development are left by the wayside in pursuit of the ‘big idea’. Besides this, production and acting in this film, while passable, are simply underwhelming. It might have been better to give a little more thought to this film before it went to distribution.
Final Rating: 3.5 out of 10 points