Cast: Nancy Stafford, Corbin Bernsen, Stacey Dash, Bejamin Dane, Melissa Temme, Jenn Gotzon, Burgess Jenkins, Tanya Christiansen, Gabriela Kostadiniva, Paul Milotte, Griffin Duy, Joel King, Robert Shepherd
Plot summary: A romantic comedy about a woman, not married to the president, who runs for the office of First Lady. However, she winds up getting a much better proposal than she ever expected. She is torn between a promise and her calling.
Longinus was raised by the Magi, but he never fully believed the stories they told of the Messiah as he rose through the ranks of the Roman army. he was at the pinnacle of his career, but an injury led to blindness, forcing him out of service. As he languished in darkness with a servant to guide his daily activities, he never dreamed that his life would be forever changed when he helped end a seemingly meaningless crucifixion of the One they called the King of the Jews.
Production Quality (2 points)
Over time, DJ Perry and his creative have definitely improved their production skills as The Christ Slayer demonstrates good camera work, effective camera angles, and professional video quality. The audio quality is also fine for the more part, and the soundtrack is culturally authentic. While the sets, locations, and props are great, the outdoor scenes are better since some of the indoor shots are a bit too dark and disorienting. Some of the editing could have been more consistent and understandable, but on the whole, this production is adequate and shows commitment to improving.
Plot and Storyline Quality (1.5 points)
The Quest Trilogy has taken many different turns, and at this point, the ending is better than the beginning. At its inception, some parts were hard to grasp and a bit too abstract, but the unique turn in The Christ Slayer definitely helped things. This is a unique extra-Biblical plot that gives a fresh perspective on the events surrounding the Crucifixion and the Resurrection, and it sports the typical abstractly creative concepts of the CDI team. The spiritual elements from Forty Nights and Chasing the Star are included in this third installment, but they are presented in more accessible fashions. Similarly, the psychological themes of The Christ Slayer are fairly well-utilized, and integration of Biblical accounts is creatively woven together with the main plot. There are a few drawbacks, however, that keep this plot from being all that it could be. For instance, there are quite a few slow scenes that tend to be too artistic such that the audience has trouble understanding them, and some of the characters’ dialogue is a bit archaic and drawn-out. There are some expository conversations that replace better character development, and sometimes, the Jesus character is a bit too ethereal and inaccessible, but as a whole, this is a fine Easter plot that demonstrates unique storytelling.
Acting Quality (1.5 points)
Probably the brightest spot of this film’s cast is the awesome idea to cast a special needs cast member in a role that doesn’t over-emphasize his condition. Treating him as a regular actor is a huge step forward for disability rights, so this creative team’s decision to do this shows a deeper care for inclusion in the arts. Elsewhere in this cast, some of the main cast members are good while some could use more efficient coaching to avoid being too theatrical and dramatic. As a whole, the acting is average, but it could have been better if emotions were more accessible. In the end, The Christ Slayer is a good end to the Quest Trilogy.
DJ Perry and company have a lot going for them, so it will be interesting to see how they will be able to collaborate with other talent in the future. Throughout their careers, they have only gotten better as they have adapted and changed, which is encouraging to see. Sometimes trilogies end worse than they begin, so since the Quest Trilogy has ended on a good note, this will hopefully be a springboard to better things in the future for CDI entertainment.
Kate Montgomery is a big city art dealer who travels to a quaint small town to purchase some mysterious paints from a mysterious artist whom no one in the art dealing world knows the true identity of. However, she is also on the run from her psychologist and her dark past. While running away, she will have to end up facing everything she’s trying to hide from in the most unlikely ways.
Production Quality (1.5 points)
While there are some positive elements in this production, there are also some negative ones. For instance, video quality and camera work are mostly fine, but there is some poor audio quality throughout. The soundtrack is also a bit generic. Lighting can be a problem at times, and the sets, locations, and props are somewhat limited in some areas. For the most part, editing is fine, even though there are a few too many lagging scenes. Thus, as a whole, this production is basically average and has some room for improvement.
Plot and Storyline Quality (.5 point)
The Colors of Emily is mostly a departure for the Rossetti group. This story tries to delve into the psychological\suspense\mystery genre, and it contains interesting attempts at psychological elements, but there is too much wasted time before getting to the substantial mystery elements. This wasted time mostly consists of tongue-in-cheek dialogue about predictable fish-out-of-water concepts, as well as a seemingly vague premise and loose grip on reality. At times, the storyline seems very unfinished, and the characters come off as too understated and under-developed. Further, the villain is fairly cheesy, especially in the ‘climax’ scene that’s full of monologuing. In short, while there is some potential in this story idea, its final product is too vague and undeveloped.
Acting Quality (.5 point)
Unfortunately, most of the acting in The Colors of Emily is very awkward and not well-coached. A lot of the cast members come off as too unnatural, although Jenn Gotzon posts a more authentic performance than usual. Moreover, there are some other strange characters in this cast, and there are too many sequences of yelling and screaming, especially in the suspense scenes. Overall, there are too many forced lines and emotions to warrant any more than half of point here.
The Colors of Emily has a good idea behind it, but its effort is basically half-cocked and incomplete. On the whole, the production needs an upgrade, as does the acting. The storyline needs more clarification and deepening, as do the characters and dialogue. This film appears to be an example of the importance of taking time to make quality films rather than just making another movie most people are going to forget about.
According to local authorities and media figures, a mysterious man who has become known as The Reconciler has been mysteriously choosing random people to force to stay together in an enclosed area until they reconcile the differences they have with one another. No one knows how or why he does what he does, or why he chooses the people he does, but multiple people have been positively affected by The Reconciler’s work. Will his identity ever be discovered or will it always he shrouded in mystery?
Production Quality (1.5 points)
With a somewhat limited budget, it’s clear that this production team did the best they could do with what they had. Camera work is fine, as it video quality. Audio quality is mostly on par, but there are some lapses. The soundtrack also needs a boost. Sets, locations, and props are presented fairly well, even if they are slightly limited. The biggest issue to point out here is the extremely choppy editing that creates a lot of confusion for the audience. This is likely due to the large amount of content that is forced into this runtime. Overall, the production of The Reconciler is average, and it’s likely it could have been better with more substantial funding.
Plot and Storyline Quality (1 point)
The idea behind The Reconciler is very interesting and creative, but it also leaves the audience somewhat scratching their heads. As previously mentioned, there is a lot of information crammed into less than two hours, and thus, the use of information dump dialogue is employed to fill in the viewer. There are also a lot of interesting flashbacks that would be better if the characters therein were developed better. However, due to the sheer amount of content here, there simply is not enough time, especially when some sequences are just wasted. There are so many subplots that need further exploring here that The Reconciler would have been far better served as a miniseries. The series format would have allowed the characters to develop better, would have given more credence to the idea behind this story, and would have allowed for more complexity and creativity. But as it is, The Reconciler makes the mistake of biting off more than it can chew—by including everything, it spreads it all too thin. For this reason, it’s difficult to appreciate what’s going on here. In the end, though there is a huge amount of potential here, and the creativity of the writers should definitely be commended, this is unfortunately not the way to present this type of idea.
Acting Quality (1 point)
As a little-known cast, these cast members show amateurishness too much. Some lines are forced and half-yelled, while others are perfectly normal. Emotions are all over the place and are too often overplayed. This cast would have definitely benefitted from better coaching.
This film receives half of an x-factor point for creativity. We absolutely need different and unique films like The Reconciler, but they need to be well-developed. Creative and complex plots are awesome when they are executed properly. The Reconciler would have made an amazing series if done properly. But once again, creativity is limited by funding. We long for the day when useless movies are no longer wasting funding opportunities and damaging the reputation of Christian film so that creativity seen in movies like The Reconciler can fully thrive and flourish to be all that they need to be. Christian film makers have the potential to change the world, but will they be given the opportunity?
A grieving widow at risk of losing more family members, Naomi is confused and disillusioned to her Jewish faith as she resides in a pagan country. When her two sons die, Naomi makes up her mind to return to her homeland in disgrace. One daughter-in-law, Orpah, turns away and goes back to her idols, but Naomi’s other daughter-in-law, Ruth, insists on going to the land of Israel with her mother-in-law to further adapt the Jewish faith and to take care of Naomi. Together, they are uncertain of the path ahead of them but they forge forward, clinging to some hope that Yahweh will look upon them with favor.
Production Quality (.5 point)
Besides clear video quality, there is nothing positive to mention regarding The Book of Ruth’s production. This film commits every cardinal sin of Bible movies: cheap sets and locations, ridiculous costuming and props, inconsistent sound quality, and choppy editing. To top things off, a lot of scenes are overshadowed by annoying background music, making it hard to focus on what’s actually going on in the story. Sometimes the music even covers up dialogue. There is really little to make this movie worth watching.
Plot and Storyline Quality (0 points)
The story of Ruth can and should be adapted to film, but this particular adaptation is just C-grade. Beginning with Oded telling the story to a young David, this tale portrays Biblical characters in an unrealistic light. It is usually difficult to understand what the characters are supposed to be doing in this movie, whether they are staring at flowers or rubbing random pieces of wood together. It doesn’t even seem like this plot was meant to be a movie, more like a church play, as we have often mentioned in the past regarding PureFlix Scriptural storylines. Any potentially good dialogue is eclipsed by odd monologues about Moabite gods and inventive cultural customs. As previously mentioned, a lot of the dialogue and plot is covered up by loud background music. In short, there is very little ability to comprehend the actual Biblical message here.
Acting Quality (0 points)
In this film, the actors and actresses stand awkwardly and recite overly practiced lines. No believable emotion is exhibited and line delivery is amateurishly theatrical. The casting was poorly executed, as they are too modern in look and not coached at all. There is too much makeup and manicures, like middle class Americans wrapped in cheap church play costumes. Once again, we could find nothing positive here.
The Book of Ruth is one of those movies we wish never existed. When a Biblical adaptation is this bad, it makes us severely embarrassed for both Christians and unbelievers alike who thought this movie would be good, only to later find that it was a DVD that should have been quietly forgotten about and later donated to the local thrift store. A word of advice to those who are contemplating a Bible movie: learn from the mistakes of movies like The Book of Ruth and never, ever repeat them. The Christian movie world cannot afford any more movies like this one.