God’s Not Dead (Movie Review)

Plot Summary

Josh Wheaton didn’t ask to be put in the philosophy class of the infamous Professor Radisson.  He also didn’t anticipate having to sign a piece of paper stating that God is dead in order to achieve a high grade in the class.  But prompted by the help of a local pastor, Wheaton decides to not only refuse to sign the paper but also to prove God’s existence in front of the class in addition to his other class assignments.  It’s something that those closest to him do not understand or agree with, but it brings him closer to God and to other people.  Little does he know that Professor Radisson and even those connected to him are being profoundly impacted in ways he never expected.


Production Quality (2.5 points)

This is perhaps the strongest area of the movie.  God’s Not Dead has better production than a majority of PureFlix movies, which shows great progress.  The camera work is great, and the editing is pretty good considering the many interconnected story lines.  The sets are authentic and varied and the lighting is good.  The soundtrack is effective.  The only real error to consider here is the fact that there may be too much content included.  In short, the money used for the movie is mostly put to good use.

Plot and Storyline Quality (1.5 points)

Unfortunately, the plot is a bit weak, mostly due to the large number of story lines.  There is nothing inherently wrong with a movie about the interconnected lives of people, and for the most part, God’s Not Dead does a fairly good job managing the content.  However, it seems like there are one too many subplots and one too many characters.  If one or two of these were eliminated and that time used to develop other more interesting characters, this movie would greatly improve.  As it is, the dialogue is pretty good considering the number of characters.  There are some interesting twists and not everything turns out as expected in the end.  Most of the characters are believable, but some seem to be caricatures.  In summary, the plot is a mixed bag with a lot of untapped potential.

Acting Quality (2 points)

When compared to older PureFlix movies, the acting in God’s Not Dead is superb, for most of the actors.  This is David A. R. White’s best acting job to date.  Shane Harper is great in his major debut.  However, Dean Cain and Trisha LaFache are uninspiring.  But still, one could argue that they did not have much to work with.  All in all, the acting is another mixed bag.


God’s Not Dead is the best PureFlix-created movie in their existence.  Improved acting, improved production quality, and improved plot development all contributed to this rise.  However, they still have not hit their ceiling.  There is a lot of potential in this movie, and on its face, it is still an above average movie.  What is most important is that the core message of God’s Not Dead is driven home without being overly preachy or unwatchable.  This is success in and of itself.


Final Rating: 6 out of 10 points


12 thoughts on “God’s Not Dead (Movie Review)

  1. Pingback: God’s Not Dead 4: We the People (Movie Review) – Box Office Revolution

  2. Pingback: Classifying B-grade Christian Movies – Box Office Revolution

  3. Pingback: PureFlix Goes to Court (Updated) – Box Office Revolution

  4. Pingback: God’s Not Dead 3: A Light in Darkness (Movie Review) – Box Office Revolution

  5. Pingback: The Genesis Code (Movie Review) – Box Office Revolution

  6. Pingback: Movie Renovation: Do You Believe? – Box Office Revolution

  7. Pingback: Movie Renovation: God’s Not Dead – Box Office Revolution

  8. Pingback: A Question of Faith [2017] (Movie Review) – Box Office Revolution

  9. Pingback: God’s Not Dead 2 (Movie Review) – Box Office Revolution

  10. Pingback: 2015 in Review: The Turning Point for Christian Films – Box Office Revolution

  11. Which characters do you think were portrayed well and vice versa?

    In my opinion, this film could be criticized for unnecessarily portraying non-Christians as villains while all the Christian characters are perfect. I think this movie would have been better if it was more realistic in the portrayal of characters.

    If you think about it, pretty much every non-Christian character is a stereotype or caricature.

    You have:

    The typical atheist college professor seeking to poison all of the children against God
    The angry, obnoxious liberal blogger trying to bring down Christians (this character is truly a straw man)
    The mean, reclusive rich guy who hates Christians for some reason
    A Muslim father banishing his converted daughter (this happens in real life but it could have been handled much better, these characters needed more time or maybe another movie to themselves)
    and even a stereotypical Chinese atheist as well that appears for basically no reason

    It is a common trap that Christian films fall into when they portray real life people in black and white tones and try too hard to drive home their point.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I see what you mean, but I felt that the Muslim father was not completely unrealistic. The same can be said for Professor Radisson. Moreover, I agree that some of the Christian characters should have been more flawed.


What did you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s